Skip to main content

Frank Lloyd Wright's "Kalil House"

Take a minute to admire this. 



In my mind, incredible doesn't even begin to describe it. Frank Lloyd Wright's "Kalil House" is one of my all-time favorite pieces of residential architecture. Maybe it's not your cup of tea, and I can understand that, but you just have to wonder: 

What would living in it be like? 

As it turns out, there's not much sense in wasting your time with that question-- odds are that neither you nor I will ever find out. The reason for that is the same reason why the Kalil House, one of Wright's great triumphs, was a complete failure.

The house was designed in his "Usonian Automatic" fashion, calling for concrete block modular construction. The idea behind this was that the building was simple to construct, like a home made of big Legos, and that the homeowners-to-be could work on it themselves to save money. In fact, almost every principle of the Usonian Automatic style was aimed toward designing inexpensive housing that families could build for themselves. Wright planned to eventually make it so easy that you could even cast your own concrete blocks and be your own contractor, forget about those skilled tradespeople. A noble idea perhaps, but ultimately a dream that never came true.

220 pounds. Each and every one of the estimated 4,800 concrete blocks in the house tipped the scales at a staggering 220 pounds (Dwell). So, almost immediately, we can say goodbye to the idea that your twee first time homeowners could put that together on their own. The construction of the Kalil House also called for a specialized machine that quickly formed the concrete blocks under pressure. This allowed them to build the home on a timeline shorter than... let's say forever. But what if you've got a bodybuilder sort of thing going on and you have all the time in the world? How much might you expect this project to run you? The Kalil House cost an estimated $70,000-- not bad, right? It sure sounds that way, until we remember that it was built in 1957. Adjusted for inflation, $70,000 from 1957 is worth...

$651,745.65. Oof.

It also just sold at auction for $850k, so we're not going to pick up an old one on sale either. And I would say that this is the single most important reason why Usonian Automatic houses never really caught on: Nobody could afford them. Despite all of his best intentions, Frank Lloyd Wright's promise to deliver cheap and cheerful housing for the masses never materialized. That's not to take away from his enormous contributions to the field and to society at large, the man is pure legend. If anything, it's almost nice that he never cracked the case. It just means that there's still a little glory to be had out there for the rest of us.



Comments

  1. Because that chance is so low, less than 6% to get a successful reel mixture, slots machines would not be in style to play. Roulette certainly one of the|is among the|is doubtless considered one of the} most popular casino video games worldwide. It is easy to know and play, which makes it a enjoyable choice, even for novices. Tachi Palace Casino Resort has upped the thrill by featuring a state-of-the-art roulette wheel and gaming desk, made by TCS John Huxley. The dealer will give all gamers time to make their bets, and solely after a lull has set in around the desk will the dealer then spin the 토토사이트 ball.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

In criticism of criticism.

How many of your ideas are actually yours?           And, to that point, how many of them do you even agree with? In the age we currently live, countless writers, critics, and general snobs make their living by giving an opinion on things that most of us have never experienced. If I read a (beautifully written, I might add) movie review by Roger Ebert, I still haven't seen the film. I may have some idea of what it was like to have seen it, but only from the perspective of Mr. Ebert himself. If I then decide to watch the movie, who could say how much different my experience will be for having these ideas preloaded into my head--ideas about whether it is a two or three star worthy film, if I had ought to believe in the characters as written and portrayed, or pointing out the holes in the plot that might otherwise have passed clear over my head. Will I enjoy the film any more or less for having this external knowledge of it? Is it possible that I'll never watch what would have bee

In defense of luxury.

 Allow me to introduce you to my first car: a Mercedes S-Class If only.  My actual first car was a clapped-out Chevy Lumina (though she was good to me). But what my car did have were airbags and ABS brakes-- two features that were once considered to be luxury features  exclusive to cars like the S-Class, yet somehow found their way onto a car that I bought from my cousin for $800. If it seems like I'm getting somewhere, it's because I'm trying to. Research is expensive. There's not really any way around that unfortunate fact, nor around the equally unfortunate fact that someone has to pay for it. I don't know about you, but I definitely can't afford to. Here's where luxury comes in. If rich people want to pay prices that would make you or I limp at the knees in order to have the latest-and-greatest gadgets and doodads then, hey, they have my best wishes. The money that luxury consumers pay for the honor of being the first to use these newer and better techn

The design of anti-design.

 This article brought to you by (brand name).  Or maybe by No Name™. That's what you're seeing there in the yellow: a brand whose whole identity is based on having no brand name. You won't find any Eggo, they only make "original waffles". No Charmin either, just "bathroom tissue".  Make no mistake, this campaign of anti-design isn't concerned with actually destroying brand image (they'll happily sell you all the bright yellow merchandise you can carry), they're more so trying to convince you that not having a design somehow puts them on the moral high ground. That, by spending a single cent on marketing or packaging design, all the other companies have duped you and you'd really be a fool not to buy all this plain yellow goodness.  It is, of course, just another way to market a brand.  To stray from consumer goods and into other areas of anti-design, this is a problem that I've often had with some works of minimalist architecture. I&#